Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species

Selz, Oliver M.; Pierotti, Michele E.R.; Maan, Martine E.; Schmid, Corinne; Seehausen, Ole

Authors

Oliver M. Selz

Martine E. Maan

Corinne Schmid

Ole Seehausen



Abstract

A critical step for speciation in the face of gene flow is the origination of reproductive isolation. The evolution of assortative mating greatly facilitates this process. Assortative mating can be mediated by one or multiple cues across an array of sensory modalities. We here explore possible cues that may underlie female mate choice in a sympatric species pair of cichlid fish from Lake Victoria, Pundamilia pundamilia and Pundamilia nyererei. Previous studies identified species-specific female preferences for male coloration, but effects of other cues could not be ruled out. Therefore, we assessed female choice in a series of experiments in which we manipulated visual (color) and chemical cues. We show that the visibility of differences in nuptial hue (i.e., either blue or red) between males of the 2 species is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating by female mate choice. Such assortment mediated by a single cue may evolve relatively quickly, but could make reproductive isolation vulnerable to environmental changes. These findings confirm the important role of female mate choice for male nuptial hue in promoting the explosive speciation of African haplochromine cichlids.

Citation

Selz, O. M., Pierotti, M. E., Maan, M. E., Schmid, C., & Seehausen, O. (2014). Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species. Behavioral Ecology, 25(3), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru024

Journal Article Type Article
Online Publication Date Mar 14, 2014
Publication Date 2014-06
Deposit Date Jan 12, 2024
Journal Behavioral Ecology
Print ISSN 1045-2249
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 25
Issue 3
Pages 612–626
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru024