Léa M. Martinon
Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time
Martinon, Léa M.; Ferrand, Ludovic; Burca, Mariana; Hasshim, Nabil; Lakhzoum, Dounia; Parris, Benjamin A.; Silvert, Laetitia; Augustinova, Maria
Authors
Ludovic Ferrand
Mariana Burca
Dr Nabil Hasshim M.N.A.B.M.Hasshim@salford.ac.uk
Lecturer
Dounia Lakhzoum
Benjamin A. Parris
Laetitia Silvert
Maria Augustinova
Abstract
The study addressed the still-open issue of whether semantic (in addition to response) conflict does indeed contribute to Stroop interference (which along with facilitation contributes to the overall Stroop effect also known as Congruency effect). To this end, semantic conflict was examined across the entire response time (RT) distribution (as opposed to mean RTs). Three (out of four) reported experiments, along with cross-experimental analyses, revealed that semantic conflict was absent in the participants’ faster responses. This result characterizes Stroop interference as a unitary phenomenon (i.e., driven uniquely by response conflict). When the same participants’ responses were slower, Stroop interference became a composite phenomenon with an additional contribution of semantic conflict that was statistically independent of both response conflict and facilitation. While the present findings allow us to account for the fact that semantic conflict has not been consistently found in past studies, further empirical and theoretical efforts are still needed to explain why exactly it is restricted to longer responses. Indeed, since neither unitary nor composite models can account for this polymorphic nature of Stroop interference on their own, the implications for the current state of theory are outlined.
Citation
Martinon, L. M., Ferrand, L., Burca, M., Hasshim, N., Lakhzoum, D., Parris, B. A., …Augustinova, M. (2024). Distributional analyses reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop interference effect: It's about (response) time. Memory and Cognition, https://doi.org/10.3758/S13421-024-01538-3
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 9, 2024 |
Publication Date | Mar 11, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Apr 15, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 12, 2025 |
Journal | Memory & Cognition |
Print ISSN | 0090-502X |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3758/S13421-024-01538-3 |
Files
This file is under embargo until Mar 12, 2025 due to copyright reasons.
Contact M.N.A.B.M.Hasshim@salford.ac.uk to request a copy for personal use.
You might also like
Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?
(2023)
Journal Article
Variations in response speed reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop effect
(2022)
Conference Proceeding
Optimizing older adults' performance in the Stroop task
(2023)
Conference Proceeding
Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search