Clinical records after asynchronous and synchronous e-learning courses

Battista, Simone; Furri, Laura; de Biagi, Giorgia; Depedri, Lucia; Broggi, Valeria; Testa, Marco

Abstract

Background

Clinical Record (CR) writing is a fundamental skill for healthcare professionals, but the best e-learning methods for teaching it remain unstudied. Therefore, we investigated speech therapy students’ differences in the quality production of CR at the placement and their experience after following asynchronous or synchronous e-learning courses.
Methods

A multi-method randomised controlled trial. Fifty speech therapist students were equally and randomly divided into two groups attending asynchronous or synchronous e-learning classes to learn how to write a CR. The quality of the CR was tested through an ad hoc checklist (score 0–32) and the groups’ scores were compared. The assessors and the statistician were blinded to students’ group assignment. Students’ experience was assessed through semi-structured interviews analysed with a reflexive thematic analysis.
Results

No score differences between the two groups were found (Cohen’s d = 0.1; 95% Confidence Interval [-0.6; 0.7]). Four themes were generated: (1) ‘Different Forms of Learning Interaction’, as the synchronous group reported a positive experience with being fed back immediately by the lecturer, whereas the asynchronous group reported that pushing back the question time allows for reflecting more on the learning experience; (2) ‘Different Ways to Manage the Time’, as the synchronous group had to stick to the lecturer’s schedule and the asynchronous group felt the possibility to manage its time; (3) ‘To Be or Not To Be (Present)?’ due to the different experiences of having (or not) the lecturer in front of them; (4) ‘Inspiring Relationships With The Peers’, where both groups preferred a peer-to-peer discussion instead of contacting the lecturer.
Discussion

Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning courses appeared equally effective in teaching CR writing. However, students perceive and experience these methods differently. The choice or blend of these methods should be based on students’ needs and preferences, teacher input, as well as organisational requirements rather than solely on students’ attended performance.

Citation

Battista, S., Furri, L., de Biagi, G., Depedri, L., Broggi, V., & Testa, M. (2023). Clinical records after asynchronous and synchronous e-learning courses. BMC Medical Education, Article 584. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04528-2

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jul 21, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Aug 18, 2023
• Publication Date: Aug 18, 2023
• Deposit Date: Sep 3, 2024
• Publicly Available Date: Sep 17, 2024
• Journal: BMC Medical Education
• Electronic ISSN: 1472-6920
• Publisher: Springer Verlag
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Article Number: 584
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04528-2
• PMID: 37596612