Niraj Thurairajah
Contractors' Perspectives on Delays in Healthcare Projects: A Tale of Two Contrasting Provisions
Thurairajah, Niraj; Rathnasinghe, Akila; Roberts, Charlie; McAdam, Brodie; Abwunza, Allan
Authors
Akila Rathnasinghe
Charlie Roberts
Mr Brodie McAdam W.B.McAdam@salford.ac.uk
Interim Deputy Dean
Allan Abwunza
Abstract
Many construction projects are delayed due to a range of factors, including the unique spatial and environmental context of every construction site, the challenges of maintaining quality, and the timing of decision making around design. In consequence, construction contracts include mechanisms to accommodate delay while maintaining enforceability. Different standard forms of contract (SFC) adopt different approaches to managing delay and lack consistency in accommodating delays of the same nature. This study selects two SFCs commonly used in UK construction projects, New Engineering Contract (NEC) and Joint Contracts Tribunal (JCT) suites, and proposes a common approach to managing delays, focusing particularly on the handling of the compensation event (CE) and Relevant Event (RE) mechanisms in those respective contracts. Using a qualitative methodology, a multi-case study analysis was conducted comprising four general contractors utilizing JCT and NEC SFCs. The case studies enabled the analytic comparison of delay-caused challenges as between different projects delivered using different SFCs. The findings reveal that while on JCT-based projects general contractors have typically suffered cash flow and programming issues caused by employer failures to adhere to contractual timescales for assessing requests for extensions of time, on NEC-based projects general contractors have suffered CE-related issues associated with programming and administration. Further findings were that the common challenges of both CE and RE management processes were high volume, assessment and timescales of claims, as well as timing and collaboration. Developing from these findings, recommendations are made for additional clauses to be added to SFCs to achieve a consistent approach towards construction delays.
Citation
Thurairajah, N., Rathnasinghe, A., Roberts, C., McAdam, B., & Abwunza, A. (in press). Contractors' Perspectives on Delays in Healthcare Projects: A Tale of Two Contrasting Provisions. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(1), https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1145
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jul 8, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 7, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Aug 16, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 7, 2024 |
Print ISSN | 1943-4162 |
Electronic ISSN | 1943-4170 |
Publisher | Coasts, Oceans, Ports and Rivers Institute |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | 1 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1145 |
Files
Accepted Version
(366 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
The acceleration dilemma : can English law accommodate constructive acceleration?
(2015)
Journal Article
Using synchronous web conferencing to enhance situated distance learner experience in a built environment context
(2011)
Presentation / Conference
Building information modelling : The UK legal context
(2010)
Journal Article
Apportionment and the Common Law : Has City Inn got it wrong?
(2009)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search