Prof Chris Littlewood C.D.Littlewood@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Prof Chris Littlewood C.D.Littlewood@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Marcus Bateman
Stephanie Butler-Walley
Sarah Bathers
Kieran Bromley
Martyn Lewis
Lennard Funk
Jean Denton
Maria Moffatt
Rachel Winstanley
Saurabh Mehta
Gareth Stephens
Lisa Dikomitis
Nadine E. Foster
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of early patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Design: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Five National Health Service hospitals in England.
Participants: Adults (n = 73) with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears scheduled for repair were recruited and randomly allocated remotely prior to surgery.
Interventions: Early patient-directed rehabilitation (n = 37); advised to remove their sling as soon as able and move as symptoms allow. Standard rehabilitation (n = 36); sling immobilisation for four weeks.
Measures: (1) Randomisation of 20% or more eligible patients. (2) Difference in time out of sling of 40% or more between groups. (3) Follow-up greater than 70%.
Results: 73/185 (39%) potentially eligible patients were randomised. Twenty participants were withdrawn, 11 due to not receiving rotator cuff repair. The between-group difference in proportions of participants who exceeded the cut-off of 222.6 hours out of the sling was 50% (80% CI = 29%, 72%), with the early patient-directed rehabilitation group reporting greater time out of sling. 52/73 (71%) and 52/53 (98%) participants were followed-up at 12 weeks when withdrawals were included and excluded respectively. Eighteen full-thickness re-tears were reported (early patient-directed rehabilitation = 7, standard rehabilitation = 11). Five serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: A main randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require allocation of participants following surgery to counter the issue of withdrawal due to not receiving surgery.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 11, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 11, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2021-06 |
Deposit Date | Nov 15, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 15, 2024 |
Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
Print ISSN | 0269-2155 |
Electronic ISSN | 1477-0873 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 35 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 829-839 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520978859 |
Keywords | physiotherapy, randomized controlled trial, Rehabilitation interventions, shoulder pain |
Published Version
(482 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search