Bruno Mazuquin
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2).
Mazuquin, Bruno; Moffatt, Maria; Realpe, Alba; Sherman, Rachelle; Ireland, Katie; Connan, Zak; Tildsley, Jack; Manca, Andrea; GC, Vijay; Foster, Nadine; Rees, Jonathan; Drew, Steven; Bateman, Marcus; Fakis, Apostolos; Farnsworth, Malin; Littlewood, Chris
Authors
Maria Moffatt
Alba Realpe
Rachelle Sherman
Katie Ireland
Zak Connan
Jack Tildsley
Andrea Manca
Vijay GC
Nadine Foster
Jonathan Rees
Steven Drew
Marcus Bateman
Apostolos Fakis
Malin Farnsworth
Prof Chris Littlewood C.D.Littlewood@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the high number of operations and surgical advancement, rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair has not progressed for over 20 years. The traditional cautious approach might be contributing to sub-optimal outcomes. Our aim is to assess whether individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation results in less shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks after surgical repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff compared to current standard (delayed) rehabilitation.
Methods and analysis: The rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair (RaCeR 2) study is a pragmatic multi-centre, open label, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot phase. It has a parallel group design with 1:1 allocation ratio, full health economic evaluation, and Quintet Recruitment Intervention. Adults awaiting arthroscopic surgical repair of a full-thickness tear are eligible to participate. Upon completion of surgery, 638 participants will be randomised. The intervention (individualised early patient-directed rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to remove their sling as soon as they feel able, gradually begin using their arm as they feel able and a specific exercise programme. Sling removal and movement is progressed by the patient over time according to agreed goals and within their own pain and tolerance. The comparator (standard rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to wear the sling for at least four weeks and only to remove while eating, washing, dressing or performing specific exercises. Progression is according to specific timeframes rather than as the patient feels able. The primary outcome measure is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score at 12-week post-randomisation. The trial timeline is 56 months in total, from September 2022.
Citation
Mazuquin, B., Moffatt, M., Realpe, A., Sherman, R., Ireland, K., Connan, Z., …Littlewood, C. (2024). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2). BMJ Open, 14, Article e081284. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 8, 2024 |
Publication Date | Apr 5, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Nov 14, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 15, 2024 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 14 |
Article Number | e081284 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284 |
Keywords | orthopaedic & trauma surgery, shoulder, randomized controlled trial, physical therapy modalities |
Files
Published Version
(1.6 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Shoulder Osteoarthritis: A survey of current (2024) UK physiotherapy practice.
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search