Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2).

Mazuquin, Bruno; Moffatt, Maria; Realpe, Alba; Sherman, Rachelle; Ireland, Katie; Connan, Zak; Tildsley, Jack; Manca, Andrea; GC, Vijay; Foster, Nadine; Rees, Jonathan; Drew, Steven; Bateman, Marcus; Fakis, Apostolos; Farnsworth, Malin; Littlewood, Chris

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2). Thumbnail


Authors

Bruno Mazuquin

Maria Moffatt

Alba Realpe

Rachelle Sherman

Katie Ireland

Zak Connan

Jack Tildsley

Andrea Manca

Vijay GC

Nadine Foster

Jonathan Rees

Steven Drew

Marcus Bateman

Apostolos Fakis

Malin Farnsworth



Abstract

Introduction: Despite the high number of operations and surgical advancement, rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair has not progressed for over 20 years. The traditional cautious approach might be contributing to sub-optimal outcomes. Our aim is to assess whether individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation results in less shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks after surgical repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff compared to current standard (delayed) rehabilitation.

Methods and analysis: The rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair (RaCeR 2) study is a pragmatic multi-centre, open label, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot phase. It has a parallel group design with 1:1 allocation ratio, full health economic evaluation, and Quintet Recruitment Intervention. Adults awaiting arthroscopic surgical repair of a full-thickness tear are eligible to participate. Upon completion of surgery, 638 participants will be randomised. The intervention (individualised early patient-directed rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to remove their sling as soon as they feel able, gradually begin using their arm as they feel able and a specific exercise programme. Sling removal and movement is progressed by the patient over time according to agreed goals and within their own pain and tolerance. The comparator (standard rehabilitation) includes advice to the patient to wear the sling for at least four weeks and only to remove while eating, washing, dressing or performing specific exercises. Progression is according to specific timeframes rather than as the patient feels able. The primary outcome measure is the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score at 12-week post-randomisation. The trial timeline is 56 months in total, from September 2022.

Citation

Mazuquin, B., Moffatt, M., Realpe, A., Sherman, R., Ireland, K., Connan, Z., …Littlewood, C. (2024). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff of the shoulder: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (RaCeR 2). BMJ Open, 14, Article e081284. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 8, 2024
Publication Date Apr 5, 2024
Deposit Date Nov 14, 2024
Publicly Available Date Nov 15, 2024
Journal BMJ Open
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Article Number e081284
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081284
Keywords orthopaedic & trauma surgery, shoulder, randomized controlled trial, physical therapy modalities

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations