Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Impact of harness attachment point on kinetics and kinematics during sled towing

Bentley, I; Atkins, SJ; Edmundson, C; Metcalfe, J; Sinclair, JK

Authors

I Bentley

C Edmundson

J Metcalfe

JK Sinclair



Abstract

Resisted sprint training is performed in a horizontal direction, and involves similar
muscles, velocities and ranges of motion (ROM) to those of normal sprinting.
Generally, sleds are attached to the athletes via a lead (3m) and harness; the most common attachment points are the shoulder or waist. At present, it is not known how
the different harness point’s impact on the kinematics and kinetics associated with
sled towing (ST). The aim of the current investigation was to examine the kinetics
and kinematics of shoulder and waist harness attachment points in relation to the acceleration phase of ST. Fourteen trained males completed normal and ST trials,
loaded at 10% reduction of sprint velocity. Sagittal plane kinematics from the trunk,
hip, knee and ankle were measured, together with stance phase kinetics (third foot
strike). Kinetic and kinematic parameters were compared between harness
attachments using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. The results
indicated that various kinetic differences were present between the normal and ST
conditions. Significantly greater net horizontal mean force, net horizontal impulses,
propulsive mean force and propulsive impulses were measured (p>0.05).
Interestingly, the waist harness also led to greater net horizontal impulse when
compared to the shoulder attachment (p = 0.000). In kinematic terms, ST conditions
significantly increased peak flexion in hip, knee and ankle joints compared to the
normal trials (p<0.05). Results highlighted that the shoulder harness had a greater impact on trunk and knee joint kinematics when compared to the waist harness
(p<0.05). In summary, waist harnesses appear to be the most suitable attachment point for the acceleration phase of sprinting. Sled towing with these attachments
resulted in fewer kinematic alterations and greater net horizontal impulse when compared to the shoulder harness. Future research is necessary, in order to explore
the long-term adaptations of these acute changes.

Citation

Bentley, I., Atkins, S., Edmundson, C., Metcalfe, J., & Sinclair, J. (2016). Impact of harness attachment point on kinetics and kinematics during sled towing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(3), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Mar 1, 2016
Deposit Date Dec 7, 2017
Journal Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Print ISSN 1064-8011
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Volume 30
Issue 3
Pages 768-776
DOI https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155
Related Public URLs http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/pages/default.aspx