I Bentley
Impact of harness attachment point on kinetics and kinematics during sled towing
Bentley, I; Atkins, SJ; Edmundson, C; Metcalfe, J; Sinclair, JK
Authors
Dr Stephen Atkins S.J.Atkins@salford.ac.uk
Director of Psychology and Sport
C Edmundson
J Metcalfe
JK Sinclair
Abstract
Resisted sprint training is performed in a horizontal direction, and involves similar
muscles, velocities and ranges of motion (ROM) to those of normal sprinting.
Generally, sleds are attached to the athletes via a lead (3m) and harness; the most common attachment points are the shoulder or waist. At present, it is not known how
the different harness point’s impact on the kinematics and kinetics associated with
sled towing (ST). The aim of the current investigation was to examine the kinetics
and kinematics of shoulder and waist harness attachment points in relation to the acceleration phase of ST. Fourteen trained males completed normal and ST trials,
loaded at 10% reduction of sprint velocity. Sagittal plane kinematics from the trunk,
hip, knee and ankle were measured, together with stance phase kinetics (third foot
strike). Kinetic and kinematic parameters were compared between harness
attachments using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. The results
indicated that various kinetic differences were present between the normal and ST
conditions. Significantly greater net horizontal mean force, net horizontal impulses,
propulsive mean force and propulsive impulses were measured (p>0.05).
Interestingly, the waist harness also led to greater net horizontal impulse when
compared to the shoulder attachment (p = 0.000). In kinematic terms, ST conditions
significantly increased peak flexion in hip, knee and ankle joints compared to the
normal trials (p<0.05). Results highlighted that the shoulder harness had a greater impact on trunk and knee joint kinematics when compared to the waist harness
(p<0.05). In summary, waist harnesses appear to be the most suitable attachment point for the acceleration phase of sprinting. Sled towing with these attachments
resulted in fewer kinematic alterations and greater net horizontal impulse when compared to the shoulder harness. Future research is necessary, in order to explore
the long-term adaptations of these acute changes.
Citation
Bentley, I., Atkins, S., Edmundson, C., Metcalfe, J., & Sinclair, J. (2016). Impact of harness attachment point on kinetics and kinematics during sled towing. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(3), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Dec 7, 2017 |
Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
Print ISSN | 1064-8011 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Volume | 30 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 768-776 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001155 |
Related Public URLs | http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/pages/default.aspx |
You might also like
Monitoring Multidirectional Speed Training
(2023)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search