AK Abdullah
The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full field digital mammography
Abdullah, AK; Thompson, JD; Kelly, J; Mercer, CE; Aspin, R; Hogg, P
Authors
JD Thompson
J Kelly
Dr Claire Mercer C.E.Mercer@salford.ac.uk
Head of Radiography
R Aspin
Prof Peter Hogg P.Hogg@salford.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective: Motion blur is a known phenomenon in full-field digital mammography, but the impact on lesion detection is unknown. This is the first study to investigate detection performance with varying magnitudes of simulated motion blur.
Method: Seven observers (15±5 years’ reporting experience) evaluated 248 cases (62 containing malignant masses, 62 containing malignant microcalcifications and 124 normal cases) for three conditions: no blurring (0 mm) and two magnitudes of simulated blurring (0.7 mm and 1.5 mm). Abnormal cases were biopsy proven. Mathematical simulation was used to provide a pixel shift in order to simulate motion blur. A free-response observer study was conducted to compare lesion detection performance for the three conditions. The equally weighted jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (wJAFROC) was used as the figure of merit. Test alpha was set at 0.05 to control probability of Type I error.
Results: wJAFROC analysis found a statistically significant difference in lesion detection performance for both masses (F(2,22) = 6.01, P=0.0084) and microcalcifications (F(2,49) = 23.14, P<0.0001). The figures of merit reduced as the magnitude of simulated blurring increased. Statistical differences were found between some of the pairs investigated for the detection of masses (0.0mm v 0.7mm, and 0.0mm v 1.5mm) and all pairs for microcalcifications (0.0 mm v 0.7 mm, 0.0 mm v 1.5 mm, and 0.7 mm v 1.5 mm). No difference was detected between 0.7 mm and 1.5 mm for masses.
Conclusion: Mathematical simulation of motion blur caused a statistically significant reduction in lesion detection performance. These false negative decisions could have implications for clinical practice.
Advances in knowledge: This research demonstrates for the first time that motion blur has a negative and statistically significant impact on lesion detection performance digital mammography.
Citation
Abdullah, A., Thompson, J., Kelly, J., Mercer, C., Aspin, R., & Hogg, P. (2017). The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full field digital mammography. British Journal of Radiology, 90(1075), https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160871
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 9, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 16, 2017 |
Publication Date | Jun 16, 2017 |
Deposit Date | May 9, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | May 16, 2018 |
Journal | British Journal of Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0007-1285 |
Electronic ISSN | 1748-880X |
Publisher | British Institute of Radiology |
Volume | 90 |
Issue | 1075 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160871 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20160871 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.bir.org.uk/publications/journals/ http://www.birpublications.org/toc/bjr/current |
Files
Second%20Revised%20Manuscript%20Clean%20[1].pdf
(837 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Clark's Essential Guide to Mammography
(2023)
Book
Practical Mammography
(2022)
Book Chapter
Digital Mammography: A Holistic Approach
(2022)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search