P Schofield
Does the factor theory of satisfaction explain political voting behaviour?
Schofield, P; Reeves, P
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to explain voter perceptions and voting behaviour in the 2010 UK General Election on the basis of this theory, by evaluating the differential impact of government performance on key political issues defined as hierarchical voter satisfaction factor types. The validity of the three-factor theory of satisfaction in explaining consumer decision-making for products and services is well-established.
Design/methodology/approach: British Election Survey (2010) data are used to test the relative influence of hierarchical voter satisfaction factor types in predicting the perceived overall performance of the former Labour government and actual voting behaviour. Sequential and multinomial logistic regression models are used in the perceived overall performance of the former Labour government and actual voting behaviour, respectively.
Findings: “Basic” factors explain more of the variance in perceived overall government performance and voting behaviour than “performance” factors. There are significant positive main and interaction effects on Conservative and Liberal Democrat party votes from Labour’s underperformance on the “basic” factors. The results have important implications for political marketing and voting behaviour research.
Originality/value: The study establishes the relevance of the three-factor theory of satisfaction within a political marketing context. It demonstrates that, controlling for party loyalty, perceived government performance on the hierarchical voter satisfaction factors explains voter perceptions and voting behaviour to a significant degree. In particular, it highlights the criticality for voting behaviour of both the direct and indirect impacts of “basic” factor underperformance.
Citation
Schofield, P., & Reeves, P. (2015). Does the factor theory of satisfaction explain political voting behaviour?. European Journal of Marketing, 49(5/6), 968-992. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2014-0524
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 19, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | May 11, 2015 |
Publication Date | May 11, 2015 |
Deposit Date | Jun 17, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 2, 2017 |
Journal | European Journal of Marketing |
Print ISSN | 0309-0566 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 49 |
Issue | 5/6 |
Pages | 968-992 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2014-0524 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2014-0524 |
Related Public URLs | http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/ejm |
Files
EJM Manuscript.pdf
(650 Kb)
PDF
EJM Manuscript.docx
(125 Kb)
Document
You might also like
The Liberal Democrat Brand: Positioning to Challenge Labour?
(2019)
Presentation / Conference
Brexit leave voters: Three potential voter segments for the Conservative Party?
(2018)
Presentation / Conference
Understanding how political parties manage their volunteers in the political marketing process
(2018)
Conference Proceeding
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search