Apposition and affective communication

Blakemore, D

Abstract

This paper focuses on the rhetorical effects of structures which involve the apposition of two (or more) segments with similar, but not identical, interpretations – for example, He felt depressed, flattened. Building on the existing relevance theoretic account of poetic effects (Sperber & Wilson 1995, Pilkington 2000), it aims to show how these structures can be used to communicate an impression of emphasis or intensification which can be compared with the effects achieved by repetitions. It argues that these effects are not achieved in the same way, and that three different cases can be distinguished. First, the use of this structure may lie in the way it encourages the reader to explore the differences between the interpretation of the second segment and the interpretation of the first. Second, it may encourage the reader to explore the total set of contextual assumptions made accessible by both (or all) segments for the derivation of an interpretation which could not be derived from any one segment alone. Finally, the paper considers the use of these structures by authors who use free indirect style to represent a character’s struggle to identify an emotion s/he is experiencing.

Citation

Blakemore, D. (2008). Apposition and affective communication. Language and Literature, 17(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007085054

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Jan 1, 2008
• Deposit Date: May 29, 2009
• Publicly Available Date: Apr 5, 2016
• Journal: Language and Literature
• Print ISSN: 0963-9470
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 37-57
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007085054
• Keywords: Emphasis, ineffability, free indirect thought/style, reformulation, repetition, weak communication
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963947007085054