Benjamin A Parris
Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?
Parris, Benjamin A; Hasshim, Nabil; Ferrand, Ludovic; Augustinova, Maria
Abstract
Task sets have been argued to play an important role in cognition, giving rise to the notions of needing to switch between active task sets and to control competing task sets in selective attention tasks. For example, it has been argued that Stroop interference results from two categories of conflict: informational and task (set) conflict. Informational conflict arises from processing the word and is resolved by a late selection mechanism; task conflict arises when two task sets (i.e., word reading and colour identification) compete for activation and can be construed as involving an early selection mechanism. However, recent work has argued that task set control might not be needed to explain all of the switching cost in task switching studies. Here we consider whether task conflict plays a role in selective attention tasks. In particular, we consider whether S-R associations, which lead to informational conflict, are enough on their own to explain findings attributed to task set conflict. We review and critically evaluate both the findings that provided the original impetus for proposing task conflict in selective attention tasks and more recent findings reporting negative facilitation (longer RTs to congruent than to neutral stimuli) – a unique marker of task conflict. We then provide a tentative alternative account of negative facilitation based on poor control over informational conflict and apply it to a number of paradigms including the Colour-Object interference and Affordances tasks. It is argued that invoking competition between task sets in selective attention tasks might not be necessary.
Citation
Parris, B. A., Hasshim, N., Ferrand, L., & Augustinova, M. (2023). Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?. #Journal not on list, 6(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.272
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 31, 2023 |
Publication Date | May 4, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Sep 15, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 18, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of Cognition |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 1 |
Article Number | 23 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.272 |
Files
Published Version
(1.9 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Variations in response speed reveal the polymorphic nature of the Stroop effect
(2022)
Conference Proceeding
Optimizing older adults' performance in the Stroop task
(2023)
Conference Proceeding
Onset complexity and task conflict in the Stroop task
(2023)
Journal Article
Primacy of mouth over eyes to perceive audiovisual Mandarin lexical tones
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search