Carole McGlone
Midwives’ experiences of asking the Whooley questions to assess current mental health: a qualitative interpretive study
McGlone, Carole; Hollins Martin, Caroline J.; Furber, Christine
Authors
Abstract
Perinatal Mental Illness (PMI) is a key cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in the UK, with one goal of midwives to identify those at risk during pregnancy. At present, the system of preliminary identification of existing PMI in the UK involves the midwife asking pregnant women the Whooley questions at the antenatal booking interview. Aim: To explore midwives experiences of asking the Whooley questions with pregnant women. Method: A qualitative interpretive study explored midwives’ (n = 8) experiences of asking the Whooley questions in one maternity unit in England (UK). Data were gathered through semistructured interviews and analysed using Framework Analysis (FWA). Findings: Themes and subthemes identified included: (1) no clear understanding of purpose, (1a) discomfort when disclosure occurs, (2) feeling pressurised for time, (3) resultant dissatisfaction and frustration; (3a) lack of knowledge and how to refer, (3b) lack of training around PMI, (3c) relying on experience and use of intuition. Discussion: The development and evaluation of an education curriculum to prepare midwives to effectively use case-finding instruments such as the Whooley questions to identify pregnant women at risk is required.
Citation
McGlone, C., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Furber, C. (2016). Midwives’ experiences of asking the Whooley questions to assess current mental health: a qualitative interpretive study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34(4), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2016.1188278
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jun 23, 2016 |
Publication Date | Aug 7, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Dec 24, 2023 |
Journal | Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology |
Print ISSN | 0264-6838 |
Electronic ISSN | 1469-672X |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 34 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 383-393 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2016.1188278 |
Keywords | Obstetrics and Gynecology; General Psychology; Reproductive Medicine; Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health |
You might also like
Verbal Feedback Assessment: An Evaluation of a Novel Feedback Communication Strategy
(2023)
Presentation / Conference
Co- Creation in action: Curriculum design
(2023)
Presentation / Conference
Maternity worforce reflecting the community's needs - race matter
(2020)
Presentation / Conference
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search