T. Lavender
Baby skin care research programme: assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial comparing impregnated cleansing wipes with water in infants
Lavender, T.; Furber, C.; Cork, M.; Campbell, M.; Victor, S.
Abstract
Background The use of baby wipes is common for cleansing of babies' skin. However, with the use of wipes come differing, and often conflicting perceptions, due to an absence of published research tackling the safety and efficacy of disposable baby wipes. Although studies have evaluated the use of baby wipes, these have tended to be on older babies or those in the neonatal unit.
Hypothesis The use of an optimally formulated cleansing wipe on the napkin area of newborns (<1 month) has an equivalent effect on skin hydration when compared with using cotton wool and water (usual care).
Method An investigator led randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted to compare a fragrance free cleansing wipe with water for cleansing the napkin area. Healthy term newborns (n=280), from the NW England were randomised to either cleansing with a baby wipe or with water only. Babies were stratified according to family history of atopic eczema. The primary outcome measure was change in hydration from within 48 h of birth to 4 weeks post birth. Secondary outcomes include trans-epidermal water loss and skin pH. We used standard statistical techniques to analyse the data, taking into account treatment group and the stratification variable.
Key findings At 4 weeks, hydration scores, pH and trans-epidermal water loss were equivalent in both groups.
Implications for practice There are currently inconsistencies in advice given to women. This study will enable informed decision making and optimise maternal choice in cleansing newborns.
Citation
Lavender, T., Furber, C., Cork, M., Campbell, M., & Victor, S. (2011). Baby skin care research programme: assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial comparing impregnated cleansing wipes with water in infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 96(Supplement 1), Fa43-Fa43. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild.2011.300164.91
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Jun 7, 2011 |
Publication Date | Jun 1, 2011 |
Deposit Date | Dec 28, 2023 |
Journal | Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition |
Print ISSN | 1359-2998 |
Electronic ISSN | 1468-2052 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 96 |
Issue | Supplement 1 |
Pages | Fa43-Fa43 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild.2011.300164.91 |
Keywords | Obstetrics and Gynecology; General Medicine; Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health |
You might also like
Verbal Feedback Assessment: An Evaluation of a Novel Feedback Communication Strategy
(2023)
Presentation / Conference
Co- Creation in action: Curriculum design
(2023)
Presentation / Conference
Maternity worforce reflecting the community's needs - race matter
(2020)
Presentation / Conference
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search