Sam Walters
Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques
Walters, Sam; Metcalfe, Benjamin; Twiste, Martin; Seminati, Elena; Bailey, Nicola Y.
Authors
Benjamin Metcalfe
Dr Martin Twiste M.Twiste@salford.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
Elena Seminati
Nicola Y. Bailey
Contributors
Fei Yan
Editor
Abstract
Monitoring the volume and shape of residual limbs post-amputation is necessary to achieve optimal socket fit and determine overall limb health, yet contemporary clinical measurement techniques show high variance between measures. Three-dimensional scanning presents an opportunity for improved accuracy and reliability of residual limb measurements, however, three-dimensional scanners remain prohibitively expensive. A cost-effective alternative is the use of software that can utilise the photographs of modern smartphone cameras to create geometrically accurate scans. Whilst several studies have investigated the potential of privately developed photogrammetry algorithms for capturing residual limbs with clinical accuracy, none to the authors knowledge have explored commercially available software to do the same. Three applications were tested, namely Polycam, Luma, and Meshroom, to determine if they could produce clinically acceptable results. Scans of ten residual limbs were created using both smartphone technology and a reference structured-light scanner (Artec EVA), against which the validity and reliability of the resulting limb models were assessed using the Bland-Altman method and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, respectively. Polycam and Luma achieved both Pearson Coefficients and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients of 0.999, and Coefficients of Variation of 1.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Volume reliability coefficients were 58.3 ml and 70.0 ml respectively for Polycam and Luma, whereas Meshroom failed to meet any of the criteria for clinical suitability, with a repeatability coefficient of 790.3 ml. Both Polycam and Luma exhibit sufficient accuracy and reliability to be considered for clinical volume measurements.
Citation
Walters, S., Metcalfe, B., Twiste, M., Seminati, E., & Bailey, N. Y. (2024). Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques. PloS one, 19(12), Article e0313542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313542
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 27, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Dec 2, 2024 |
Publication Date | Dec 2, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Dec 12, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 12, 2024 |
Journal | PLOS ONE |
Print ISSN | 1932-6203 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 12 |
Article Number | e0313542 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313542 |
Files
Published Version
(3.3 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Development and validation of a bespoke phantom to test accuracy of Cobb angle measurements
(2019)
Journal Article
The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search