Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques

Walters, Sam; Metcalfe, Benjamin; Twiste, Martin; Seminati, Elena; Bailey, Nicola Y.

Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques Thumbnail


Authors

Sam Walters

Benjamin Metcalfe

Elena Seminati

Nicola Y. Bailey



Contributors

Fei Yan
Editor

Abstract

Monitoring the volume and shape of residual limbs post-amputation is necessary to achieve optimal socket fit and determine overall limb health, yet contemporary clinical measurement techniques show high variance between measures. Three-dimensional scanning presents an opportunity for improved accuracy and reliability of residual limb measurements, however, three-dimensional scanners remain prohibitively expensive. A cost-effective alternative is the use of software that can utilise the photographs of modern smartphone cameras to create geometrically accurate scans. Whilst several studies have investigated the potential of privately developed photogrammetry algorithms for capturing residual limbs with clinical accuracy, none to the authors knowledge have explored commercially available software to do the same. Three applications were tested, namely Polycam, Luma, and Meshroom, to determine if they could produce clinically acceptable results. Scans of ten residual limbs were created using both smartphone technology and a reference structured-light scanner (Artec EVA), against which the validity and reliability of the resulting limb models were assessed using the Bland-Altman method and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, respectively. Polycam and Luma achieved both Pearson Coefficients and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients of 0.999, and Coefficients of Variation of 1.1% and 1.4%, respectively. Volume reliability coefficients were 58.3 ml and 70.0 ml respectively for Polycam and Luma, whereas Meshroom failed to meet any of the criteria for clinical suitability, with a repeatability coefficient of 790.3 ml. Both Polycam and Luma exhibit sufficient accuracy and reliability to be considered for clinical volume measurements.

Citation

Walters, S., Metcalfe, B., Twiste, M., Seminati, E., & Bailey, N. Y. (2024). Smartphone scanning is a reliable and accurate alternative to contemporary residual limb measurement techniques. PloS one, 19(12), Article e0313542. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313542

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 27, 2024
Online Publication Date Dec 2, 2024
Publication Date Dec 2, 2024
Deposit Date Dec 12, 2024
Publicly Available Date Dec 12, 2024
Journal PLOS ONE
Print ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 19
Issue 12
Article Number e0313542
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313542

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations