Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measuring the quality of peer-reviewed publications in social work : impact factors - liberation or liability

Blyth, E; Shardlow, SM; Masson, H; Lyons, K; Shaw, I; White, S

Authors

E Blyth

SM Shardlow

H Masson

K Lyons

I Shaw

S White



Abstract

Systems for measuring the quality of publications in peer-reviewed academic journals have achieved importance in the 'audit culture' to which academia worldwide has become increasingly subjected. In the United Kingdom this debate has focused on government proposals to give greater emphasis to bibliometrics (counts of journal articles and their citations) as a measurement of research quality, in respect of publications in the emergent Research Excellence Framework (REF) which is set to replace the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE). This approach impacts on social work educators who are the main producers of papers published in peer-reviewed academic journals. It affects their publishing behaviour by pressurising them to publish their work in journals that are regarded as being prestigious, for which 'high impact factor' journals as determined by Thomson Reuters—a private commercial information management enterprise with headquarters in the United States—has become a proxy for quality. In this paper the authors describe and critique the Thomson Reuters system as it applies to social work and propose an alternate fair, inclusive and transparent system for assessing the quality of publications based on peer evaluation and incorporating an ethical approach consistent with the discipline's professional values.

Citation

Blyth, E., Shardlow, S., Masson, H., Lyons, K., Shaw, I., & White, S. (2010). Measuring the quality of peer-reviewed publications in social work : impact factors - liberation or liability. Social Work Education, 29(2), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470902856705

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Mar 1, 2010
Deposit Date Feb 11, 2010
Journal Social Work Education
Print ISSN 0261-5479
Publisher Routledge
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 29
Issue 2
Pages 120-136
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470902856705
Keywords Knowledge; Knowledge Transfer; Profession; International; Research
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615470902856705