Going offline: An exploratory cultural artifact analysis of an internet dating site’s development trajectories

Fletcher, G; Light, BA

Abstract

In this study we develop a theorization of an Internet dating site as a cultural artifact. The site, Gaydar, is targeted at gay men. We argue that contemporary received representations of their sexuality figure heavily in the site’s focus by providing a cultural logic for the apparent ad hoc development trajectories of its varied commercial and non-commercial services. More specifically, we suggest that the growing sets of services related to the website are heavily enmeshed within current social practices and meanings. These practices and meanings are, in turn, shaped by the interactions and preferences of a variety of diverse groups involved in what is routinely seen within the mainstream literature as a singularly specific sexuality and cultural project. Thus, we attend to two areas – the influence of the various social engagements associated with Gaydar together with the further extension of its trajectory 'beyond the web'. Through the case of Gaydar, we contribute a study that recognizes the need for attention to sexuality in information systems research and one which illustrates sexuality as a pivotal aspect of culture. We also draw from anthropology to theorize ICTs as cultural artifacts and provide insights into the contemporary phenomena of ICT enabled social networking.

Citation

Fletcher, G., & Light, B. (2007). Going offline: An exploratory cultural artifact analysis of an internet dating site’s development trajectories. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 422-431

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Publication Date: Dec 1, 2007
• Deposit Date: Sep 10, 2009
• Journal: International Journal of Information Management
• Print ISSN: 0268-4012
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 422-431
• Keywords: Internet, dating, Gaydar, homosexuality, relationships, communication, social networking, ICT
• Additional Information: References : Adam, A. (2005), Gender, Ethics and Information Technology, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Adam, A., Howcroft, D. and Richardson, H. (2004), A Decade of Neglect: Reflecting on Gender and IS, New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(3), pp. 222-240. Ali, S. (2004), Using Visual Materials, in Seale, C. (Ed.) Researching Society and Culture, Sage Publications, London, pp. 265-278. Aunger, R. (2003) Cultural transmission and diffusion, in Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Lynn Nadel (ed.), MacMillan, London, http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~rva20/EncyclCogSci.pdf. Beasley, C. (2005), Gender and Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers, Sage Publications, London. Binnie, J. (2004), The Globalization of Sexuality, Sage Publications Ltd, London. Bolding, G., Davis, M., Sherr, L. and Hart, G. (2004), Use of Gay Internet Sites and Views About Online Health Promotion Among Men Who Have Sex with Men, AIDS Care, 16(8), pp. 993-1001. Brownlow, C. and O'Dell, L. (2002), Ethical Issues for Qualitative Research in On-line Communities, Disability and Society, 17(6), pp. 685-694. Bruce, S. and Yearley, S. (2006), The Sage Dictionary of Sociology, Sage Publications, London. Carter, D. (2005), Living in Virtual Communities: An Ethnography of Human Relationships in Cyberspace, Information Communication and Society, 8(2), pp. 148-167. Connell, R. W. (2005), Masculinities, Polity, Cambridge. Coupland, C. and Brown, A. D. (2004), Constructing Organizational Identities on the Web: A Case Study of Royal Dutch/Shell, Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), pp. 1325-1347. Cranny-Francis, A., Waring, W., Stavropouos, P. and Kirkby, J. (2003), Gender Studies: Terms and Debates, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Dowsett, G. W. (2003), Some Considerations on Sexuality and Gender in the Context of AIDS, Reproductive Health Matters, 11(22), pp. 21-29. Dyer, W. G. and Wilkins, A. L. (1991), Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, Academy of Management Review, 16(3), pp. 613-619. Ess, C. and AoIR Ethics Working Commitee (2002), Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee, Approved 27 November 2002. www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf, Accessed: November 2005. Gadamer, G. (1989) Truth and Method, Crossroad, New York. Halberstam, J. (2003), What's That Smell? Queer Temporalities and Subcultural Lives, International Journal Of Cultural Studies, 6(3), pp. 313-333. Harris, M. (1979) “A Reply to Sahlins”, New York Review of Books, 26(11), pp.51-53. Hearn, J. and Parkin, W. (1995), 'Sex' at 'Work': The Power and Paradox of Organisation Sexuality, St Martins Press, New York. Hine, C. (2000), Virtual Ethnography, Sage Publications, London. Hofstede, G. (1991), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London. Jameson, F. (1984) Postmodernism: or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, New Left Review, no. 146, pp. 59-92. Knights, D. (1997), Organisation Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited, Organisation Studies, 18(1), pp. 1-19. Kvansy, L., Greenhill, A. and Trauth, E. M. (2005), Giving Voice to Feminist Projects in MIS Research, International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 1(1), pp. 1-18. Lemonnier, P. (1993) Introduction in Lemonnier, P. (ed.) Technological Choices : Arbitraries in Technology from the Neolithic to Modern High Technology, Routledge, London. Levi-Strauss, C. (1955) Triste Tropiques, Librarie Plou, Paris. Livia, A. (2002), Public and Clandestine: Gay Men's Pseudonyms on the French Minitel, Sexualities, 5(2), pp. 201-217. Malinowski, B. and Ellis, H. (1929) The Sexual Life of Savages in North-West Melanesia, Routledge, London. Mead, M. (1949) [1928] Coming of Age in Samoa, New American Library, New York. Miller, D. (1991), Material Culture and Mass Consumption, Blackwell, Oxford. Miller, D. and Slater, D. (2000) The Internet: an ethnographic approach, Berg, Oxford. Murphy, D., Rawstorne, P., Holt, M. and Ryan, D. (2004), Cruising and Connecting Online: The use of Internet Chat Sites by Gay Men in Sydney and Melbourne, National Centre in HIV Social Research, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney. Nicholas, C. L. (2004), Gaydar: Eye-Gaze as Identity Recognition Among Gay Men and Lesbians, Sexuality and Culture, 8(1), pp. 60-86. Oldenziel, R. (1996) Technology, Culture and Gender in W. Kingery (ed), Learning from Things: Method and Theory of Material Culture Studies, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. Person, E. S, (1980) Sexuality as the Mainstay of Identity: Psychoanalytic Perspectives, Women: Sex and Sexuality, 5(4), pp.605-30. Riceour, P. (1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, J. Thompson (trans), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Richardson, D. (2001), Sexuality and Gender, in Smelser, N. and Bates, P. (Eds), Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, New York. Robertson, J. (2005), Anthoropology Rediscovers Sexuality, in Robertson, J. (Ed.) Same-sex Cultures and Sexualities: An Anthropological Reader, Blackwell Publishing Limited, Oxford, pp. 15-32. Rubin, G. (1984), Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality, in Vance, C. S. (Ed.) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York, pp. 267-319. Shanks, M. & Hodder, I. (1997) Processual, postprocessual and interpretative archaeologies in I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last and G. Lucas (eds), Interpreting Archaeology, Routledge, London. Smart, B. (1992) Modern Conditions, Postmodern Controversies, Routledge, London. Spitz, D. and Hunter, S. D. (2005), Contested Codes: The Social Construction of Napster, The Information Society, 21(4), pp. 169-180. Sunday Times (2006) Downloading Mr Right, Sunday Times Magazine, 15 January, pp. 18-25. Taussig, M. (1993) Mimiesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses, Routledge, New York. Thomas, J. (1997) Reconciling symbolic significance with being-in-the-world, in I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last & G. Lucas (eds) Interpreting Archaeology, Routledge, London. Tilley, C. (1989) Interpreting Material Culture in I. Hodder (ed), The Meaning of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, HarperCollins Academic, Hammersmith. Touraine, A. (1974) The Post-Industrial Society, Random House, London. Trauth, E. M. (2002), Odd Girl Out: An Individual Differences Perspective on Women in the IT Profession, Information Technology and People, 15(2), pp. 98-118. Walsham, G. (1995), Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method, European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), pp. 74-81. Walsham, G. (2000), Globalization and IT: Agenda for Research, in Baskerville, R., Stage, J. and De Gross, J. I. (Eds), Organizational and Social Perspectives on Research and Practice in Information Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 195-210. Weeks, J. (1985), Sexuality and its Discontents: Meanings, Myths and Modern Sexualities, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Wharton, A. S. (2005), The Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Williams, R. (1983) Keywords, Oxford University Press, New York. Winner, L. (2004), Who Will Be In Cyberspace? in Webster, F., Blom, R., Karvonen, E., Melin, H., Nordenstreng, K. and Puoskari, E. (Eds), The Information Society Reader, Routledge, London, pp. 45-44. Voget, F. (1979) A History of Ethnology, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.