Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Does the experience of the endoscopic vein harvester matter to the quality of the vein conduit: A critical thematic literature review

Kay, Michael; Abouelela, Youssef; Raaj, Sam; Krishnamoorthy, Bhuvaneswari

Does the experience of the endoscopic vein harvester matter to the quality of the vein conduit: A critical thematic literature review Thumbnail


Authors

Michael Kay

Youssef Abouelela

Sam Raaj



Abstract

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains the golden standard surgical option for multiple vessel disease. Harvesting the long saphenous vein using endoscopic vein harvesting requires advanced surgical skills dexterity, but the lack of a national standardised training programme allows for variance in the learning curve and the quality of the vein during the learning cycle is unknown. A search of bibliographic databases: CINHAL Plus, Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane register for randomised controlled trials identified 11 articles eligible for review. The themes emerging were learning curve-associated injuries to the long saphenous vein, intimal wall remodelling of the long saphenous vein and incidence of graft patency rates. Harvesting practitioners with less than 100 cases of experience inflict more conduit injuries leading to endothelial remodelling and narrowed vein grafts at the six-month point resulting in lumen loss. Practitioners with more than 100 cases demonstrated reduced learning curve-related injuries on the conduit. Adopting a formalised structured training programme such as the Manchester Endoscopic Learning Tool has shown to reduce endothelial injury to the long saphenous vein minimising early vein graft failure during the learning cycle.

Citation

Kay, M., Abouelela, Y., Raaj, S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (in press). Does the experience of the endoscopic vein harvester matter to the quality of the vein conduit: A critical thematic literature review. Journal of Perioperative Practice, https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241288512

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 12, 2024
Online Publication Date Oct 22, 2024
Deposit Date Oct 29, 2024
Publicly Available Date Dec 13, 2024
Journal Journal of Perioperative Practice
Print ISSN 1750-4589
Electronic ISSN 2515-7949
Publisher SAGE Publications
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241288512

Files

Accepted Version (1.8 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
Reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses





You might also like



Downloadable Citations