Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Courtroom data and politeness research : a case for neo-Peircean semiotics in interpersonal pragmatics

Wilson, JJ; Price, H

Courtroom data and politeness research : a case for neo-Peircean semiotics in interpersonal pragmatics Thumbnail


Authors



Abstract

In this article, we take a neo-Peircean semiotic approach to analyzing an interaction in which a routine bail hearing between a defendant and a judge goes awry. Neo-Peircean semiotics is steadily gaining recognition within linguistics for providing a new perspective on meaning. One neo-Peircean approach, referred to as Relationship Thinking (Enfield, 2009; 2013), has the potential to be influential for politeness research and linguistic pragmatics generally. In this article, we explore how the concept of relationship can be used to explore meaning on two dimensions: residential and representational (Kockelman, 2006 a;b). It is our contention that both of these dimensions are crucial to developing an understanding of what happens in the courtroom data on which this special issue focusses. We begin by providing a detailed overview of neo-Peircean semiotics in order to demonstrate its utility for researchers from different disciplines. We then show how a neo-Peircean analytical approach can illuminate elements of data that may not be accounted for in other analyses. This is as a consequence of the neo-Peircean framework’s scope and its capacity for coping with a range of interactionally significant phenomena, from individual linguistic tokens to institutional norms. In our analysis of the data at the heart of this special issue, the Penelope Soto case, we show that problems can arise when interactants have different understandings of what is a sign and what is an interpretant (Peirce, 1955). We make the case that it is a misunderstanding at this level (specifically the interpretations of the word “value”) that is ultimately what causes the interaction to conclude in the way that it does. Ultimately, we suggest that a neo-Peircean approach to the study of in/appropriate behaviour can facilitate links between the traditional (and sometimes disparate) methods of analysis used in politeness research.

Citation

Wilson, J., & Price, H. (2018). Courtroom data and politeness research : a case for neo-Peircean semiotics in interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 63-95. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0056

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 23, 2018
Online Publication Date Jan 24, 2018
Publication Date Feb 23, 2018
Deposit Date May 25, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jan 24, 2019
Journal Journal of Politeness Research
Print ISSN 1612-5681
Electronic ISSN 1613-4877
Publisher De Gruyter
Volume 14
Issue 1
Pages 63-95
DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0056
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0056
Related Public URLs https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jplr

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations