Prof Bhuvana Bibleraaj B.Bibleraaj@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Prof Bhuvana Bibleraaj B.Bibleraaj@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Prof Heather Iles-Smith H.M.Iles-Smith@salford.ac.uk
Professor
Samuel Henry Howitt
Lajos Szentgyorgyi
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for managing severe cardiorespiratory failure. However, it is invasive and requires profound analgo-sedation during initiation and often throughout the therapy. Managing sedation in venovenous (VV) ECMO patients is particularly challenging due to the impact of ECMO circuits on pharmacokinetics and specific patient requirements. This can lead to unpredictable sedative effects and require multiple drugs at higher doses. Additionally, sedation is usually managed with traditional scoring methods, which are subjective and invalid during neuromuscular blockade. These uncertainties may impact outcomes. Recent clinical practice increasingly focuses on reducing sedation to enable earlier physiotherapy and mobilisation, particularly in patients awaiting transplants or receiving mechanical circulatory support. In this context, processed electroencephalogram-based (pEEG) sedation monitoring might be promising, having shown benefits in general anaesthesia and intensive care. However, the technology has limitations, and its benefits in ECMO practice have yet to be formally evaluated. This review provides insights into the challenges of ECMO sedation, including pharmacokinetics, unique ECMO requirements, and the implications of inadequate sedation scores. Finally, it includes a brief overview of the practicality and limitations of pEEG monitoring during VV-ECMO, highlighting a significant research gap.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 29, 2025 |
Online Publication Date | Mar 8, 2025 |
Publication Date | Mar 8, 2025 |
Deposit Date | Mar 7, 2025 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 9, 2026 |
Journal | Journal of Artificial Organs |
Print ISSN | 1434-7229 |
Electronic ISSN | 1619-0904 |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01494-y |
Accepted Version
(354 Kb)
Document
Copyright Statement
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]
Published Version
(2.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The role of the bedside assistant in robot-assisted surgery: A critical synthesis
(2022)
Journal Article
The current state of the surgical care team in the United Kingdom: Shall we ‘do a time out’?
(2021)
Journal Article
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search