Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Improving data acquisition speed and accuracy in sport using neural networks

Sanders, Ross; Naemi, Roozbeh; Andersen, Jordan; Elipot, Marc

Authors

Ross Sanders

Jordan Andersen

Marc Elipot



Abstract

Video analysis is used in sport to derive kinematic variables of interest but often relies on time-consuming tracking operations. The purpose of this study was to determine speed, accuracy and reliability of 2D body landmark digitisation by a neural network (NN), compared with manual digitisation, for the glide phase in swimming. Glide variables including glide factor; instantaneous hip angles, trunk inclines and horizontal velocities were selected as they influence performance and are susceptible to digitisation propagation error. The NN was “trained” on 400 frames of 2D glide video from a sample of eight elite swimmers. Four glide trials of another swimmer were used to test agreement between the NN and a manual operator for body marker position data of the knee, hip and shoulder, and the effect of digitisation on glide variables. The NN digitised body landmarks 233 times faster than the manual operator, with digitising root-mean-square-error of ~4-5 mm. High accuracy and reliability was found between body position and glide variable data between the two methods with relative error ≤5.4% and correlation coefficients >0.95 for all variables. NNs could be applied to greatly reduce the time of kinematic analysis in sports and facilitate rapid feedback of performance measures.

Citation

Sanders, R., Naemi, R., Andersen, J., & Elipot, M. (2020). Improving data acquisition speed and accuracy in sport using neural networks. Journal of sports sciences, 39(5), 513-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1832735

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 1, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 14, 2020
Publication Date Oct 14, 2020
Deposit Date Aug 21, 2024
Journal Journal of Sports Sciences
Print ISSN 1466-447X
Electronic ISSN 1466-447X
Publisher Taylor and Francis
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 39
Issue 5
Pages 513-522
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1832735