R Ali
Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography
Ali, R; England, A; Mercer, CE; Tootell, AK; Walton, LA; Schaake, W; Hogg, P
Authors
A England
Dr Claire Mercer C.E.Mercer@salford.ac.uk
Head of Radiography
AK Tootell
LA Walton
W Schaake
Prof Peter Hogg P.Hogg@salford.ac.uk
Abstract
Objectives: Establish a method to determine and convey lifetime radiation risk from FFDM screening.
Methods: Radiation risk from screening mammography was quantified using effective risk (number of radiation-induced cancer cases/million). For effective risk calculations, organ doses and examined breast MGD were used. Screening mammography was simulated by exposing a breast phantom for cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique for each breast using 16 FFDM machines. An ATOM phantom loaded with TLD dosimeters was positioned in contact with the breast phantom to simulate the client’s body. Effective risk data were analysed using SPSS software to establish a regression model to predict the effective risk of any screening programme. Graphs were generated to extrapolate the effective risk of all screening programmes for a range of commencement ages and time intervals between screens.
Results: The most important parameters controlling clients’ total effective risk within breast screening are the screening commencement age and number of screens (correlation coefficients were -0.865 and 0.714, respectively). Since the tissue radio-sensitivity reduces with age, the end age of screening does not result in noteworthy effect on total effective risk.
Conclusions: The regression model can be used to predict the total effective risk for clients within breast screening but it cannot be used for exact assessment of total effective risk. Graphical representation of risk could be an easy way to represent risk in a fashion which might be helpful to clients and clinicians.
Citation
Ali, R., England, A., Mercer, C., Tootell, A., Walton, L., Schaake, W., & Hogg, P. (2017). Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography. European Journal of Radiology, 96, 98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.003
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 1, 2017 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 3, 2017 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Oct 9, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 3, 2018 |
Journal | European Journal of Radiology |
Print ISSN | 0720-048X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Volume | 96 |
Pages | 98-103 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.003 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.003 |
Related Public URLs | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-radiology |
Files
P Hogg Revised Manuscript.pdf
(959 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Clark's Essential Guide to Mammography
(2023)
Book
Practical Mammography
(2022)
Book Chapter
Digital Mammography: A Holistic Approach
(2022)
Book
Downloadable Citations
About USIR
Administrator e-mail: library-research@salford.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search